Erogito

Restoration and Neoclassical Miscellanea

Dryden and Pope: The Art of Writing

Ignorance is not grounds for criticism.

Ignorance is not grounds for criticism.

John Dryden and Alexander Pope came from different educational backgrounds and perspectives.  Dryden received a classical education and was a graduate of Trinity College. On the other hand, Pope did not receive a classical education and educated himself through self study and determination. Despite their vastly different backgrounds, both are considered masters of literary criticism and authorship during England’s Restoration and Neoclassical Period.  Their views on both issues are expressed in essays on the subjects. Dryden addresses the characteristics needed of an effective critic in “An Essay of Dramatic Poesy” and “The Author’s Apology for Heroic Poetry and Heroic License,” while in “An Essay on Criticism,” Pope addresses effective qualities needed in a critic, as well as readers and authors.

The two men also believed that great poets study and emulate the ancients such as Virgil and Homer. However, the two authors differ when it comes to formal education. Dryden uses the example of Shakespeare to contend that while Shakespeare “was naturally learned . . . He is many times flat, insipid; his comic with degenerating into clenches, his serious swelling into bombast” (2,255). Alternatively, Pope believes that taste and genius are given by “Heaven”. Pope illustrates true poets are in danger of having their genius “bewildered in the maze of schools, / And some made coxcombs Nature meant but fools” (26-27).

When discussing writers, Pope states, “Authors are partial to their wit, ’tis true / But are not critic to their judgment too?”, arguing that the lesser of two evils is being a bad writer, because a bad critic influences many while a bad writer only influences those who have read their literature (17-18). Pope observes that “if we look more closely, we shall find / Most have the seeds of judgment in their mind” (19-20). The message in Fig. 1 embodies Pope’s idea that misleading the public due to ignorance is a greater offensive than poorly written literature

Dryden concurs with this sentiment, positing “[Wit] is propriety of thoughts and words; or in other terms thoughts and words elegantly adapted to the subject” (2257). Dryden also notes that if critics assented to this definition, then there would be no reason for poets and critics to disagree (2257). However, if there’s one thing both Dryden and Pope agree on, it’s the art of writing and the skill-set required to mold a great writer. With more of a visual imagination, Dryden expresses his views on writing as “rhetoric made an art” (2256). Although Dryden at times doesn’t seem to stay faithful to his words, he still knows how to feed the mind full of satire and wit. Pope’s mastery shines through clever, accessible language and comedy; a feat exceptionally impressive given the level of education he received growing up.

Sources:

  •  The Norton Anthology of English Literature, Volume C: The Restoration and the 18th century (9th Edition).  New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2006.
  • “Criticisms of Others Quotes and Sayings”. Search Quotes.com. 16 Sept. 2013

Posted by:  Amanda McDaniel, Jennifer Prior, Jared Deal, Lorainne Oritz, Kiari Stewart and Jae Yi

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on September 28, 2013 by in Uncategorized.
%d bloggers like this: